Artichokes growing in Werribee South, an area that uses recycled water for irrigation. Jen Sheridan
Australians eat a lot of water – the water that is used to produce our food. New findings from our Foodprint Melbourne study estimate that more than 475 litres of water is used to grow each person’s food every day.
This is just the irrigation water used to grow our food. We consume much more than 475 L if you include rainwater (which isn’t tracked in national water accounts) or water used in processing and manufacturing.
To put this in context, the amount of water used to grow food for Melbourne each year (758 GL) is around double the amount of water used in people’s homes (376 GL).
The amount of water needed to feed Australia will increase as the population grows, but the availability of water for food production is likely to decrease, due to the impacts of climate change and greater competition. This could reduce food production in the nation’s major food bowl, the Murray-Darling Basin.
A lack of water for food production could lead to rising food prices, as was seen during Australia’s Millennium Drought. Between 2005 and 2007 food prices increased at twice the rate of the Consumer Price Index. Fruit and vegetable prices increased by 33-43%.
Recycling rules
As competition for water increases, recycled water is likely to become more important. Recycled water can be used to produce food if treated to a high standard.
It is already used to produce food in irrigation schemes near Melbourne and Adelaide that use water from city water treatment plants. But relatively little of the available recycled water is used. Recycled water accounts for just 1% of the irrigation water used for agriculture in Australia.
City fringe foodbowls present a unique opportunity to reduce the vulnerability of food production to drought, because they are close to sources of recycled water from city water treatment plants.
Melbourne has two main treatment plants in the east and west, which are close to key vegetable-growing areas in Melbourne’s west (Werribee) and south-east (Casey, Cardinia and the Mornington Peninsula).
Around 6% of the water from these treatment plants is used for agriculture and 10% is used in other ways. The other 84% of the recycled water is disposed of at sea.
Not all of the recycled water produced by Melbourne’s water treatment plants can currently be used for agriculture. A significant amount of the water is produced during winter, outside of the main growing season, and Melbourne lacks the infrastructure to store the recycled water and to pipe it to farmers.
Farmers can also experience issues with water quality. They may need to adjust some farming practices to use recycled water effectively.
However, our findings suggest that just 10% of the recycled water available from the city’s treatment plants could produce enough vegetables to meet around half of the needs of Melbourne’s population. That would make a valuable contribution to the security of the city’s food supply.
Investing for the future
Investments in infrastructure to store and deliver recycled water to more farmers could “drought proof” some parts of Melbourne’s food bowl, securing local vegetable production in these areas.
Similar arguments have been made recently in South Australia. A proposal to store recycled water produced during winter at one of Australia’s largest recycled water schemes, the Virginia Pipeline Scheme, would make water available to farmers during the growing season.
The importance of investing in infrastructure to use recycled water for food production became clear in Victoria during Australia’s Millennium Drought. In 2004, the Victorian government decided to invest in upgrading treatment at Melbourne’s Western Treatment Plant at Werribee. This meant recycled water could be used as a “supplementary” source of water for vegetable farmers in nearby Werribee South, one of the state’s most important areas of vegetable production.
By 2006, very little river or groundwater was available. Recycled water became the main source of water for vegetable growers in the area, enabling production to continue through the drought.
Australia has some of the largest recycled water initiatives in the world. The use of recycled water for agriculture is also growing in other regions experiencing water pressures, such as California.
As a dry region that is likely to become drier in future, there are good reasons for Australia to expand the use of recycled water for food production, particularly in city food bowls, and to invest now in infrastructure that will secure supplies of local fresh foods for the future.
About The Authors
Rachel Carey, Research Fellow, University of Melbourne; Jennifer Sheridan, Researcher in sustainable food systems, University of Melbourne, and Seona Candy, Research Fellow: Sustainable Food Systems, University of Melbourne
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Related Books
Climate Adaptation Finance and Investment in California
by Jesse M. Keenan
This book serves as a guide for local governments and private enterprises as they navigate the unchartered waters of investing in climate change adaptation and resilience. This book serves not only as a resource guide for identifying potential funding sources but also as a roadmap for asset management and public finance processes. It highlights practical synergies between funding mechanisms, as well as the conflicts that may arise between varying interests and strategies. While the main focus of this work is on the State of California, this book offers broader insights for how states, local governments and private enterprises can take those critical first steps in investing in society’s collective adaptation to climate change. Available On Amazon
Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas: Linkages between Science, Policy and Practice
by Nadja Kabisch, Horst Korn, Jutta Stadler, Aletta Bonn
This open access book brings together research findings and experiences from science, policy and practice to highlight and debate the importance of nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas. Emphasis is given to the potential of nature-based approaches to create multiple-benefits for society.
The expert contributions present recommendations for creating synergies between ongoing policy processes, scientific programmes and practical implementation of climate change and nature conservation measures in global urban areas. Available On Amazon
A Critical Approach to Climate Change Adaptation: Discourses, Policies and Practices
by Silja Klepp, Libertad Chavez-Rodriguez
This edited volume brings together critical research on climate change adaptation discourses, policies, and practices from a multi-disciplinary perspective. Drawing on examples from countries including Colombia, Mexico, Canada, Germany, Russia, Tanzania, Indonesia, and the Pacific Islands, the chapters describe how adaptation measures are interpreted, transformed, and implemented at grassroots level and how these measures are changing or interfering with power relations, legal pluralismm and local (ecological) knowledge. As a whole, the book challenges established perspectives of climate change adaptation by taking into account issues of cultural diversity, environmental justicem and human rights, as well as feminist or intersectional approaches. This innovative approach allows for analyses of the new configurations of knowledge and power that are evolving in the name of climate change adaptation. Available On Amazon
From The Publisher:
Purchases on Amazon go to defray the cost of bringing you InnerSelf.comelf.com, MightyNatural.com, and ClimateImpactNews.com at no cost and without advertisers that track your browsing habits. Even if you click on a link but don't buy these selected products, anything else you buy in that same visit on Amazon pays us a small commission. There is no additional cost to you, so please contribute to the effort. You can also use this link to use to Amazon at any time so you can help support our efforts.
